Both the 3d comic Syntax Error and the more "established" NY Times [abstract only, $$ for full] have been discussing the Incredibles in light of calling children special.
Is it all right to call someone mediocre or average? Or should everyone be given a pat on the shoulder for their "accomplishment" ? What makes a better long term strategy? Real competition with winners and loosers, or scoreless games where it is more important to take part? "competition versus coddling" - should we be happy and content, or are there still enough though problems to solve, to strive for, to give it blood, sweat and tears?
Well, as the last "question" might indicate, I lean towards the attitude that not everyone is equally good at everything. I wouldn't want Carson fixing my plumbing or the security system of a major bank. But that doesn't mean he's not great - just not someone I percieve as overly analytical or hands-on (at least not "in character" as part of Fab5) And on the flip side, I wouldn't want Alan Greenspan redoing my wardrobe. Bottom line? Figure out what you might be special at - and then put some effort into it. Or 50 years down the line, no one will remember why Europe and the US were so great...
Something copletely different - saw an ad for a Earthsea minisereies over at SciFi. Looks real good - not all that surprised considering the success of LOTR, the story is right up there in terms of intense twist and far out locations. Looks like something to order up on dvd for next xmas!? Check out the interactive map and the trailers.
...and the sun has just risen through a wonderful halo of crimson and red clouds...
